Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 21 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 4242 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

anyone with input 8.203 or 8.300 best choice ?

emerson8
Will tonight do some updates and fixes with a HA setup with 2 320's.
Using AD as backend and have users complaining about the proxy performance of the current 8.202.

For those who know......8.300 an improvement och safe bet to go with 8.203?

Been reading/searching these forums and can't make out what seems to be the best. Some say that 8.2 is the worst and therefor either 8.1 or 8.3 would be better....


t.i.a.


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
  • 0
    how many users?  what kind of connection speeds?  Can you provide screenshots of network, cpu, ram usages?

    Owner:  Emmanuel Technology Consulting

    http://etc-md.com

    Former Sophos SG(Astaro) advocate/researcher/Silver Partner

    PfSense w/Suricata, ntopng, 

    Other addons to follow

  • 0
    100 mb internet,
    using ALL nics
    cpu 8%
    ram approx 60% of 2Mb
  • 0
    how many users and what other features are you using?

    Owner:  Emmanuel Technology Consulting

    http://etc-md.com

    Former Sophos SG(Astaro) advocate/researcher/Silver Partner

    PfSense w/Suricata, ntopng, 

    Other addons to follow

  • 0
    sorry, missed that,
    approx 200

    usage is proxy and vpns mostly.
  • 0
    Btw, been trying the;
    1) enable SSH for both loginuser && root in the Management > System Settings > Shell Access
    2) ssh to ASG and login with loginuser
    3) su root
    4) cc set http sc_local_db mem
    5) /var/mdw/scripts/httpproxy restart
    6) wait until it complete downloading ~300Mb (for me it downloaded at 8Mbps).

    But mine still reports 0 when checking the size for the DL.
    nothing seems to come down.
  • 0
    ouchies..200 on two 320's?  8.3 helped a bit..every little bit helps.  I would also activate support on this one.  if you have plat call Astaro if standard talk to your reseller/partner.

    Owner:  Emmanuel Technology Consulting

    http://etc-md.com

    Former Sophos SG(Astaro) advocate/researcher/Silver Partner

    PfSense w/Suricata, ntopng, 

    Other addons to follow

  • 0 in reply to emerson8
    Btw, been trying the;
    1) enable SSH for both loginuser && root in the Management > System Settings > Shell Access
    2) ssh to ASG and login with loginuser
    3) su root
    4) cc set http sc_local_db mem
    5) /var/mdw/scripts/httpproxy restart
    6) wait until it complete downloading ~300Mb (for me it downloaded at 8Mbps).

    But mine still reports 0 when checking the size for the DL.
    nothing seems to come down.


    right now the local database is having issues.  stick with cloudy please.

    Owner:  Emmanuel Technology Consulting

    http://etc-md.com

    Former Sophos SG(Astaro) advocate/researcher/Silver Partner

    PfSense w/Suricata, ntopng, 

    Other addons to follow

  • 0
    if you jsut turned on local database use
    cc set http sc_local_db none
    5) /var/mdw/scripts/httpproxy restart

    Owner:  Emmanuel Technology Consulting

    http://etc-md.com

    Former Sophos SG(Astaro) advocate/researcher/Silver Partner

    PfSense w/Suricata, ntopng, 

    Other addons to follow

  • 0
    with 200 users on a 320 i would not recommend mem based local database in the first place.

    Owner:  Emmanuel Technology Consulting

    http://etc-md.com

    Former Sophos SG(Astaro) advocate/researcher/Silver Partner

    PfSense w/Suricata, ntopng, 

    Other addons to follow

  • 0
    Thanks again,

    Why should the local DB be a worse choice if having 200 users ?
    Either if I use disk or mem, it should be faster anyway since the boxes aren having any high loads otherwise.....
Cookie Information Banner