Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 25 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 3994 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

7.202

James Shakour
What does this firmware update correct for DNS?


-J


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    7.202 updates to the patched version of BIND to resolve the DNS cache poisoning vulnerability.  7.202 does require a reboot.
  • 0 in reply to Jack Daniel
    Jack,

    My Up2Date says it does not require a reboot, is this wrong?


    -J
  • 0 in reply to James Shakour
    I just updated one of my boxes and it did not reboot!


    -J
  • 0 in reply to James Shakour
    It has been changed since the last I heard- you are correct, it does not require a reboot.
  • 0 in reply to Jack Daniel
    thank you for confirming.


    -J
  • 0 in reply to Jack Daniel
    Any chance of an update for 6.3?

    Barry
  • 0 in reply to BarryG
    I am seeing this after applying 7.202 patch for DNS. Does this indacate a problem. I have never seen these messages before

    2008-08-04 17:40:34 Daemon.Info fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-17:43:07 dhcpc-sh: DHCP connection fine. Checking again in 60 seconds
    2008-08-04 17:40:41 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-17:43:14 kernel: net_enable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=6
    2008-08-04 17:40:41 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-17:43:14 kernel: net_enable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=7
    2008-08-04 17:40:41 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-17:43:14 kernel: net_enable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=8
    2008-08-04 17:40:41 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-17:43:14 kernel: net_disable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=7
    2008-08-04 17:40:41 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-17:43:14 kernel: net_disable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=6
    2008-08-04 17:40:41 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-17:43:14 kernel: net_disable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=5
    2008-08-04 17:40:47 Daemon.Info fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-17:43:21 confd[19088]: id="3106" severity="info" sys="System" sub="confd" name="authentication successful" client="dns-resolver.plx" facility="system" user="system" srcip="127.0.0.1"
    2008-08-04 17:40:47 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-17:43:21 kernel: net_enable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=6
    2008-08-04 17:40:47 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-17:43:21 kernel: net_disable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=5
    2008-08-04 17:40:47 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-17:43:21 kernel: net_enable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=6
    2008-08-04 17:40:48 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-17:43:21 kernel: net_disable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=5
    2008-08-04 17:40:48 Daemon.Info fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-17:43:21 confd[19088]: id="3100" severity="info" sys="System" sub="confd" name="abort" client="dns-resolver.plx" facility="system" user="system" srcip="127.0.0.1"
    2008-08-04 17:40:48 Daemon.Info fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-17:43:21 confd[19088]: id="3100" severity="info" sys="System" sub="confd" name="logout" client="dns-resolver.plx" facility="system" user="system" srcip="127.0.0.1"
  • 0 in reply to MarkMurphy
    Is the system properly resolving DNS?
    Any other symptoms?
  • 0 in reply to Jack Daniel
    Is the system properly resolving DNS?
    Any other symptoms?


    Yes it seems to be resolving OK, The timestamp message does come accross everytime I issue a reslove reqest and this is a new message I have never seen before. I will try and reboot and see if this goes away
  • 0 in reply to MarkMurphy
    After reboot I still am seeing the messages. The firewall is setup to forward to OpenDNS, From a client I use nslookup, Use the server command to connect to the firewall and then issue a lookup. I get a valid return but the following messages are logged

    2008-08-04 18:57:11 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-18:59:45 kernel: net_enable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=6
    2008-08-04 18:57:11 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-18:59:45 kernel: net_disable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=5
    2008-08-04 18:57:23 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-18:59:57 kernel: net_enable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=6
    2008-08-04 18:57:23 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-18:59:57 kernel: net_disable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=5
    2008-08-04 18:57:23 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-18:59:57 kernel: net_enable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=6
    2008-08-04 18:57:24 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-18:59:57 kernel: net_disable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=5
    2008-08-04 18:57:24 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-18:59:57 kernel: net_enable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=6
    2008-08-04 18:57:24 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-18:59:57 kernel: net_disable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=5
    2008-08-04 18:57:24 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-18:59:57 kernel: net_enable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=6
    2008-08-04 18:57:24 Kernel.Warning fw1.markandbeth.net 2008:08:04-18:59:57 kernel: net_disable_timestamp [named]: netstamp_needed=5
  • 0 in reply to MarkMurphy
    We have lots of customers still on 6.3. Will a patch be released for Astaro 6?
Reply Children
No Data
Cookie Information Banner