Guest User!

You are not Sophos Staff.

This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

WAF issues after updating to 9.709-3

Hi,

anyone else noticed that after updating to 9.709-3 Exchange Web Services is not working anymore? We get HTTP Error 500 when connecting to EWS published trhrough WAF. Also, the virtual server changes to orange when this error occurs. Accessing EWS through the browser shows the service page after authentication, but when interacting with EWS by using the Exchange Remote Connectivity Analyzer or EWS Editor generates the HTTP 500 error and the WAF rule turns orange.

When directly connecting to EWS and bypassing UTM works fine and we can interact with EWS.

Before the update everything worked fine.

Franc.



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • We finally got a response from Sophos support, but not the one we wanted:

    We've received the following feedback from our Dev and PM teams:

    The issue that the customer encountered is related to some custom extensions to the HTTP protocol that Microsoft started using. It seems like these were not always critical, so many customers found that WAF still worked even though we could not support these extensions. However, with the recent necessary changes to Apache on the UTM, it seems like we've run out of leeway there.

    The solution to this would require us to substantially re-write the WAF code to handle these Microsoft-specific protocol extensions, which does not seem to happen in the near future.

    This is a Feature Request as confirmed and you can post an idea on this portal for the requirement: https://ideas.sophos.com/, where, the concerned teams actively look for requirements reported by users and take further decisions based on the volume impacted.
      

    As Technical Support does not follow up on feature requests, your case will be closed.  If you wish to have more information about a feature request, please contact your Reseller or local Sales Engineer. 

  • This begs two questions:

    a) Is this handled correctly in XG? (Honestly, either a "yes" and a "no" here has different negative implications when you think about it)
    b) Is this handled correctly in other solutions (FortiNet or SonicWall)?

Reply Children