Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 1 subscriber
  • Views 569 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

TACACS+ und UTM9.1

CiscoChris929
Hallo zusammen,
ich würde gerne unsere UTM 9.1 an unseren TACACS-Server anflanschen (zwecks WebAdmin-Login)

Mit unseren Juniper-Switchen klappt das wunderbar - da hatte ich eine Anleitung für den TACACS-Server.


Gibts so eine Anleitung für die UTM9.1 auch?
Der Servertest sagt OK, aber der User wird abgelehnt, da eine Gruppe zu fehlen scheint?


Danke für wure Hilfe.


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    Die entsprechenden Einträge aus dem User Authentication Daemon-Log wären interessant...

    Evtl. musst du den Haken bei "Create Users automatically" setzen...

    ----------
    Sophos user, admin and reseller.
    Private Setup:

    • XG: HPE DL20 Gen9 (Core i3-7300, 8GB RAM, 120GB SSD) | XG 18.0 (Home License) with: Web Protection, Site-to-Site-VPN (IPSec, RED-Tunnel), Remote Access (SSL, HTML5)
    • UTM: 2 vCPUs, 2GB RAM, 50GB vHDD, 2 vNICs on vServer (KVM) | UTM 9.7 (Home License) with: Email Protection, Webserver Protection, RED-Tunnel (server)
Reply
  • 0
    Die entsprechenden Einträge aus dem User Authentication Daemon-Log wären interessant...

    Evtl. musst du den Haken bei "Create Users automatically" setzen...

    ----------
    Sophos user, admin and reseller.
    Private Setup:

    • XG: HPE DL20 Gen9 (Core i3-7300, 8GB RAM, 120GB SSD) | XG 18.0 (Home License) with: Web Protection, Site-to-Site-VPN (IPSec, RED-Tunnel), Remote Access (SSL, HTML5)
    • UTM: 2 vCPUs, 2GB RAM, 50GB vHDD, 2 vNICs on vServer (KVM) | UTM 9.7 (Home License) with: Email Protection, Webserver Protection, RED-Tunnel (server)
Children
No Data
Cookie Information Banner