Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5 replies
  • Subscribers 3 subscribers
  • Views 1595 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Hardware sizing

Godself
Hello guys!

We have an ASG 220 with currently 60 users (precisely 79 daily active IPs if we use that IP count command by SSH).

I am thinking about upgrading and Sophos recommend using SG210 to replace the old ASG220.

My question is: why would I ever use a SG210 if even SG135 has so much better hardware (throughput , connections, CPU and memory) compared to UTM220? Despite users being way higher then sophos sizing suggests for a 135, we currently have only 3 links but their sum is not even 100Mbps. [:S]

Thankas!


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    Actually that´s what Sophos told me if I ever were to replace a specifically appliance.

    ASG120 -> SG125
    ASG 220 -> SG210

    and so son...

    That´s why I started comparing their capacity (hardware, throughput, etc)
  • 0 in reply to Godself
    Actually that´s what Sophos told me if I ever were to replace a specifically appliance.

    ASG120 -> SG125
    ASG 220 -> SG210

    and so son...

    That´s why I started comparing their capacity (hardware, throughput, etc)


    you need to get a partner involved then.  We have the most up2date information available.  watch for a PM.
Reply
  • 0 in reply to Godself
    Actually that´s what Sophos told me if I ever were to replace a specifically appliance.

    ASG120 -> SG125
    ASG 220 -> SG210

    and so son...

    That´s why I started comparing their capacity (hardware, throughput, etc)


    you need to get a partner involved then.  We have the most up2date information available.  watch for a PM.
Children
No Data