what I' ve done for torrenting is this:I tried this and I'm still finding that the firewall is dropping packets.
Routing:
DNAT:
Source: Any Ipv4
service: port bittorrent uses(Laptop = 65535, Desktop 65534 as examples),
destination: external(address)
change destination to: the destination that fits the port mentioned above
Firewall
DNAT' s auto-firewall rules are checked
no special rules have been made
IPS: disabled the rules mentioned in earlier posts
if I recall correctly that's all you have to do [;)]
name: bittorrent
type: TCP/UDP
source: 1:65535
destination: 688x
Created DNAT rule for each host
from: any
using service: bittorrent
to: external WAN
change destination to
automatically create firewall rule
For each host (all running windows 7), I set utorrent to use the particular port with UPNP enabled.
The number of packets seemed to reduce, but I am still getting quite a few (up to 10's of thousands / day) packets dropped for both tcp and udp.
The only difference I can see is that I used any ipv4 or ipv6, rather than any ipv4 as shown above.
Any suggestions?
what I' ve done for torrenting is this:I tried this and I'm still finding that the firewall is dropping packets.
Routing:
DNAT:
Source: Any Ipv4
service: port bittorrent uses(Laptop = 65535, Desktop 65534 as examples),
destination: external(address)
change destination to: the destination that fits the port mentioned above
Firewall
DNAT' s auto-firewall rules are checked
no special rules have been made
IPS: disabled the rules mentioned in earlier posts
if I recall correctly that's all you have to do [;)]
name: bittorrent
type: TCP/UDP
source: 1:65535
destination: 688x
Created DNAT rule for each host
from: any
using service: bittorrent
to: external WAN
change destination to
automatically create firewall rule
For each host (all running windows 7), I set utorrent to use the particular port with UPNP enabled.
The number of packets seemed to reduce, but I am still getting quite a few (up to 10's of thousands / day) packets dropped for both tcp and udp.
The only difference I can see is that I used any ipv4 or ipv6, rather than any ipv4 as shown above.
Any suggestions?