Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 3 subscribers
  • Views 1113 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

how about this?

suse
http://www.shadowlair.com/reviews/astaro_vs_ipcop.shtml 


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    Well, the review was comparing the smallest ASL version (no SPAM protection, no VirusScanning for SMTP or POP etc...) to an improved version of SmoothWall. Also the ease of instalation and configuration was completly disregarded. I don't think that the it shows the real picture.    
Reply
  • 0
    Well, the review was comparing the smallest ASL version (no SPAM protection, no VirusScanning for SMTP or POP etc...) to an improved version of SmoothWall. Also the ease of instalation and configuration was completly disregarded. I don't think that the it shows the real picture.    
Children
  • 0 in reply to Vukasin
    i have tested ipcop few weeks ago but it wasnt so easy to configure as what they say in that review. off course there are differences in both system like you have ids in ipcop and for so far i know ipcop can have two wan connections. didnt test that one. ipcop and astaro can learn more from each other. they are both good in there own way.   if you tested both systems youll see the differences your self. see also aXs Guard Enterprises.  
  • 0 in reply to karabela
    I agree, I just said that the article was rather poor. I have a good opinion of ipcop (although I still prefer ASL)