You're right, I just send RA messages with the managed Flag and a prefix information header, my windows seven obtains an IP per SLAAC and an other IP per DHCPv6 .. (and a third temporary address of course).
I thought DHCPv6 may have the priority on SLAAC if it's supported by the device ... but no, so as you said DHCPv6 and SLAAC can't be used together for address assignement.
I have a question on interaction between DHCPv6 and RA messages on astaro.
I understand that when DHCPv6 is used on an interface, RA are sent automatically to provide the gateway.
The question is, why do you specify the prefix without the autonomous flag ? You can just send RA without prefix information header, that's the difference ? To set On link Determination Option ?
Exemple : DHCPv6 sever is enable on eth2, FC00::/64 prefix is define without the autonomous flag.
You're right, I just send RA messages with the managed Flag and a prefix information header, my windows seven obtains an IP per SLAAC and an other IP per DHCPv6 .. (and a third temporary address of course).
I thought DHCPv6 may have the priority on SLAAC if it's supported by the device ... but no, so as you said DHCPv6 and SLAAC can't be used together for address assignement.
I have a question on interaction between DHCPv6 and RA messages on astaro.
I understand that when DHCPv6 is used on an interface, RA are sent automatically to provide the gateway.
The question is, why do you specify the prefix without the autonomous flag ? You can just send RA without prefix information header, that's the difference ? To set On link Determination Option ?
Exemple : DHCPv6 sever is enable on eth2, FC00::/64 prefix is define without the autonomous flag.
