I think utm must have been "remembering" the entries despite them being deleted from dhcpd.leases, but after rebooting utm a couple of times, the duplicates seem to have disappeared.
I will grant that this isn't a serious bug, but it's flakey. If utm had a proper mechanism for deleting a lease, maybe there would not have been duplicates.
I think utm must have been "remembering" the entries despite them being deleted from dhcpd.leases, but after rebooting utm a couple of times, the duplicates seem to have disappeared.
I will grant that this isn't a serious bug, but it's flakey. If utm had a proper mechanism for deleting a lease, maybe there would not have been duplicates.