Guest User!

You are not Sophos Staff.

Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Replies 5 replies
  • Subscribers 0 subscribers
  • Views 1419 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested

[8.103][BUG][CLOSED] IPv6 DHCP Static Mappings

x-cimo
When editing an existing DHCP Static Mapping (Previously created with IPv4), if you use the dropdown, and select IPv6, and enter a DUID Address with a IPv6 Address, I get the following error:

"The Confd reported an error without providing any details."
But even worst, if you refresh the page and look at the bottom, you will find that the IPv6 mapping has been added properly but in a seperate mapping.

Even worst, if you do not realise this, and re try editing the existing IPv4 mapping and add the ipv6 again, and re do the procedure, it will create another identical IPv6 Mapping, I ended up having 3 IPv6 mapping at the bottom before realizing what was happening
Parents Reply Children
  • 0 in reply to x-cimo
    Here are the logs that happen right after assigning an IPv6 address to an existing IPv4 mapping.. I hidden my IP with X.X.X.X 


    2011:06:09-11:05:12 plasmashield confd[15858]: W Message::err_set:643() => id="3100" severity="warn" sys="System" sub="confd" name="OBJECT_DELETE_PARENT (The DHCPv4 static mapping object 'unnamed' is still used by the DHCPv4 server object 'unnamed'. | Proceed with object deletion anyway?)" class="dhcp" type="server" ref="REF_emQPxQYHNP" objname="REF_emQPxQYHNP" user="JP" srcip="X.X.X.X" facility="webadmin" client="index.plx" call="del_object" chref="REF_FTtpoLxpge" chname="REF_FTtpoLxpge" chtype="mac_map" chclass="dhcp"

    2011:06:09-11:05:12 plasmashield confd[15858]: W Message::err_set:643() => id="3100" severity="warn" sys="System" sub="confd" name="OBJECT_DELETE_REALLY (Are you sure that you want to delete the DHCPv4 static mapping object 'unnamed'?)" class="dhcp" type="mac_map" objname="REF_FTtpoLxpge" user="JP" srcip="X.X.X.X" facility="webadmin" client="index.plx" call="del_object"

    2011:06:09-11:05:12 plasmashield confd[15858]: I Storage::commit:344() => id="3100" severity="info" sys="System" sub="confd" name="internal commit" user="JP" srcip="X.X.X.X" sid="ReKjdMSakMlyijKSdJiQ" facility="webadmin" client="index.plx" storage="/cfg"

    2011:06:09-11:05:12 plasmashield confd[5047]: I main::top-level:475() => id="310a" severity="info" sys="System" sub="confd" name="object created" class="dhcp" type="duid_map" ref="REF_BRLZZSsygf" objname="REF_BRLZZSsygf" user="JP" srcip="X.X.X.X" sid="ReKjdMSakMlyijKSdJiQ" facility="webadmin" client="index.plx" pid="15858"

    2011:06:09-11:05:12 plasmashield confd[5047]: I main::top-level:577() => id="310n" severity="info" sys="System" sub="confd" name="applied changes" user="JP" srcip="X.X.X.X" sid="ReKjdMSakMlyijKSdJiQ" facility="webadmin" client="index.plx" pid="15858" version="1305" storage="/cfg"

    2011:06:09-11:05:13 plasmashield confd[15858]: I Storage::commit:344() => id="3100" severity="info" sys="System" sub="confd" name="internal commit" user="JP" srcip="X.X.X.X" sid="ReKjdMSakMlyijKSdJiQ" facility="webadmin" client="index.plx" storage="/cfg"

    2011:06:09-11:05:13 plasmashield confd[5047]: I main::top-level:475() => id="310a" severity="info" sys="System" sub="confd" name="object changed" class="dhcp" type="server6" ref="REF_dWJtoXtBVz" objname="REF_dWJtoXtBVz" user="JP" srcip="X.X.X.X" sid="ReKjdMSakMlyijKSdJiQ" facility="webadmin" client="index.plx" pid="15858" attr_mappings="['REF_BRLZZSsygf']" oldattr_mappings="[]"

    2011:06:09-11:05:13 plasmashield confd[5047]: I main::top-level:577() => id="310n" severity="info" sys="System" sub="confd" name="applied changes" user="JP" srcip="X.X.X.X" sid="ReKjdMSakMlyijKSdJiQ" facility="webadmin" client="index.plx" pid="15858" version="1306" storage="/cfg" 
  • 0 in reply to x-cimo
    has anyone been able to replicate this issue?
Unfiltered HTML