i wouldn't call that outright wrong, as the two ASG software versions 8.055 and 8.060 use the same Confd storage format, see https://support.astaro.com/support/index.php/Confd_storage_format_version for details. A storage written by 8.060 looks exactly the same as a storage written by 8.055, hence the phrase "written by Astaro release 8.055".
Still, i admit this wasn't obvious from the wording used, and it must seem confusing to the user, so i changed the code to not report the *storage* format version on that line, but the *software* version instead. You still see the storage format versions involved on the following lines ("compatible with ...").
So, in the future, you will see something like this in similar cases:
written by Astaro release 8.060
compatible with format version(s):
* 43
* 8002
* 8055
i wouldn't call that outright wrong, as the two ASG software versions 8.055 and 8.060 use the same Confd storage format, see https://support.astaro.com/support/index.php/Confd_storage_format_version for details. A storage written by 8.060 looks exactly the same as a storage written by 8.055, hence the phrase "written by Astaro release 8.055".
Still, i admit this wasn't obvious from the wording used, and it must seem confusing to the user, so i changed the code to not report the *storage* format version on that line, but the *software* version instead. You still see the storage format versions involved on the following lines ("compatible with ...").
So, in the future, you will see something like this in similar cases:
written by Astaro release 8.060
compatible with format version(s):
* 43
* 8002
* 8055
