[7.470][QUESTION][ANSWERED] delete DNAT/SNAT object gives garbage name

When trying to delete an old DNAT/SNAT, the pop up message says "The packetfilter->nat object 'REF_sTQUiRfYBz' is still used by the nat->rules configuration. Proceed with object deletion anyway?"

Shouldn't the 'REF_sTQUiRfYBz' be the name of the DNAT/SNAT?

Parents

0 anonymous_02 over 16 years ago

This is not exactly a bug, but we will change it.
Users should never get confronted with REF_ strings.

There is however one exception: If you don't give a name to an object, it get's it's REF_ string as name.
You can change the name of your objects at any time.

Regards,
Daniel
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel

Reply

0 anonymous_02 over 16 years ago

This is not exactly a bug, but we will change it.
Users should never get confronted with REF_ strings.

There is however one exception: If you don't give a name to an object, it get's it's REF_ string as name.
You can change the name of your objects at any time.

Regards,
Daniel
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel

Children

0 dmzalarm over 16 years ago in reply to anonymous_02

This is not exactly a bug, but we will change it.
Users should never get confronted with REF_ strings.
....

Thks, Daniel

whether it is considered a "bug" or not isn't important since I didn't find it first :-)

I am sure lots of folks here will be happy to hear that it will be changed.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel