[7.460][BUG][NOTABUG] Filter Action

Hi All

I've created two proxy profiles along with filter assignments and filter actions. However, when I've tried to delete the filter actions entry, I came up with the attached error message. I had no issue deleting the filter assignment and filter proxy entries

Not sure is it important to now the pattern i've used but I've initially deleted the proxy profile, then the proxy assignment and then I 've tried to delete the proxy action

At the moment all the users are using the default http proxy with no issues. The attached filter action was referring to the DMZ zone

Parents

0 Astaro Beta Bot over 16 years ago

Astaro Beta Report
--------------------------------
Version: 7.460
Type: BUG
State: NOTABUG
Reporter: wingman
Contributor: 
MantisID: 
--------------------------------

0 lilith over 16 years ago in reply to Astaro Beta Bot

Hi wingman,

I got the following reply with firefox when the proxy profile and the filter assignment still exists while deleting the action:

The http->cff_action object 'test filter action' is required by the http->cff_profile object 'test'.
Will delete the using object, too.
The http->cff_profile object 'test' is still used by the http->profile object 'test'.
Proceed with object deletion anyway?

Can you confirm this?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 wingman over 16 years ago in reply to lilith

yes it seems to work if you delete the ojects in the correct order!
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 lilith over 16 years ago in reply to wingman

...but it seems to work correct for me. If I delete the filter action first the following message appears:

The http->cff_action object 'test filter action' is required by the http->cff_profile object 'test assign'.
Will delete the using object, too.
The http->cff_profile object 'test assign' is still used by the http->profile object 'test profile'.
Proceed with object deletion anyway?

When I try to delete the profile first I get this message:

The http->profile object 'test profile' is still used by the http->profiles configuration.
Proceed with object deletion anyway?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 wingman over 16 years ago in reply to lilith

lilith,i still have the same issue (2-7-2009 7-08-23 ??.png ) when trying to delete the "filter action". However, I don't have any problem deleting the "filter assignment" ( 2-7-2009 7-11-15 ??.png )

Please notice the difference in the confirmation box (both pics are taken using ie)

(tried with ie7, chrome and firefox )

see attached picture

What version are you running?

Linux ******.home.dyndns.org 2.6.16.62-113-smp #1 SMP Thu May 28 09:21:38 UTC 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 lilith over 16 years ago in reply to wingman

I'm using ASG release 7.460 with firefox 3.0.10 and ubuntu Linux 2.6.27-14-generic #1 SMP Wed Apr 15 18:59:16 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 wingman over 16 years ago in reply to lilith

that make sense (we have different kernel version). I am using the latest beta though (7.460):s

It seems my version is newer than yours (May 28 09:21:38 UTC 2009 vs Apr 15 18:59:16 UTC 2009)
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 wingman over 16 years ago in reply to wingman

According to the post here, there are 3 different version of 7.460 :s

That might explain things
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 BAlfson over 16 years ago in reply to wingman

Only three? [;)]

Seriously, I am amazed that we've reached that level of standardization. Apparently, the adoption of ajax was a good decision...

Cheers - Bob
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel

Reply

0 BAlfson over 16 years ago in reply to wingman

Only three? [;)]

Seriously, I am amazed that we've reached that level of standardization. Apparently, the adoption of ajax was a good decision...

Cheers - Bob
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel

Children

No Data