Still the same problem as before ... every time when i want to setup a uplink balancing it say's "one option ... syntatically or logically incorrect" ...
If you'd like me to take a look at this for you, feel free to PM me with an IP, port, and login information, and if you include a phone number I can give you a call and see if we can figure out whats happening for you.
If you'd like me to take a look at this for you, feel free to PM me with an IP, port, and login information, and if you include a phone number I can give you a call and see if we can figure out whats happening for you.
sorry, but multipathrouting is not 10000+6000=16000. Multipathrouting managed the best speed for clients. When your cable is busy because there is another user ´s download with 1,1 Mbit/s then become your client the ADSL 6000 with 600kb/s. multipath managed the best way for you to the internet.
What andre says is correct. Link balancing is not going to make a single download from a site any faster for a single client, in that your request is going to go out one of the connections and use that connection to download the file. If your using multiple users, programs which can spawn threads and use different connection paths (rebuilding things themselves locally), or other applications which can take advantage of this type of setup, then you will indeed notice a speed boost. You can also configure your advanced multipath rules to better accommodate common connections, desired protocols, or source/destinations that should be balanced specifically according to your needs.
Without any multipath rule the default behavior is traffic persistence by source IP for one hour. This means, all connections from the same client will be routed over the same line, in your case either 6Mbit or 10Mbit.
You have to define multipath rules, e.g.: Source ANY, Destination ANY, Service HTTP, persistence by SRC-DST This would redirect traffic from the same client to different servers over multiple lines. E.g google.com goes over line1 and yahoo.com over line2