I think it is disappointing that a categorisation of Astaro users is not allowed so that we can allow a non Astaro administrator general access to the Mail Manager portal. We have an auditor category, so presumably it would not have been difficult to extend this to a similar category.
we are currently working on extending the RoleBased administration to additional roles. But there are many different possible roles wanted. Some want a Mail Admin, others a Web Administrator, third a VPN admin, we also have requests for a dedicated mail manager role, other want certan admins to only extend exceptions but not change it, ....
And so on.
Therefore it is not quite simple to find a way to cover it all, we are searching for ways to cover most of the requests.
we are currently working on extending the RoleBased administration to additional roles. But there are many different possible roles wanted. Some want a Mail Admin, others a Web Administrator, third a VPN admin, we also have requests for a dedicated mail manager role, other want certan admins to only extend exceptions but not change it, ....
And so on.
Therefore it is not quite simple to find a way to cover it all, we are searching for ways to cover most of the requests.
we are developping an ISP/ASP complete web application for which we are managing roles for any type of feature, here is what we are doing:
- each page/functionality is identified by a role type/id which is uniq... - for each role we can set privilege (view, modification, admin) - and we create several default roles to which a user can be assigned - we are of course able to add custom roles
this is really easy to handle you only need to add a function at top of perl script to check the user privileges against the role type/id of the page to process, if he can only view, modify or admin things... and pages to manage roles/privileges for users... with such a thing everybody is happy... you can add a vpn admin which is able to manage only vpn stuff, email admins, ... or just some view only accounts..
