This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

How to remove Bridge without disruption?

New to XG Firewall, and trying to resolve an issue.

Another Tech setup this XG135 Firewall, and configured a Bridge Interface for ports 1 and 3-8. Routing is enabled on the Bridge.

We are seeing issues with LAN to LAN communication. The Firewall is blocking access to other LAN devices.

We want to allow all LAN to LAN traffic without filtering.

There is one cable connected to the Switch, on XG port 2.

How can we remove the Bridge, and just have a LAN Interface on Port 2?  Can we re-configure it without disruption to users?

Thanks!



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents Reply Children
  • We removed the Bridge and set Port1 as the LAN.

    Client is still reporting an ActiveX Control installation via browser to their internal Phone Server (192.168.14.x IP) is being blocked by Sophos Web Protection, as a restricted file type.

    At this point we do not want any kind of filtering on LAN devices.

    We already have the Phone Server IP entered in Web Exceptions for HTTPS Decryption, Malware / Content Scanning, Sandstorm and Policy Checks.

  • You need to setup a firewall rule that does not have any http functions ticked, web or application.

    Ian

  • Hey  

    Is Sophos Endpoint also installed on your client's PCs? Just wanted to confirm that this block is not being caused by it's Web Protection feature.

    You mention that you do not want any kind of filtering for LAN to LAN communication, have you created a LAN to LAN network firewall created with no filtering (web,application) configured?

    Regards,

    FloSupport | Community Support Engineer