Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 26 subscribers
  • Views 6113 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

DNAT rule v17

Carlos Cesario

Hi Sophos XG Team!

Why in V17 now is it needed usage objects in DNAT rules?

It seems that instead to make it more easy, in each upgrade you make it more complex/unclear/unstable.

 



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
  • 0

    Hi Carlos,

    Could you explain what you mean by usage objects?

    Most configuration for Business/DNAT rules have remained the same from v16. The only major changes include allowing you to specify a Source Port for Service Objects.

    Thanks,
    Karlos

  • 0 in reply to Karlos

    Hi Karlos,

    We have devices with 50 DNAT Rules, after upgrade to v17 the Public source ports they were converted to Objects, now I cannot rename these objects, because they are in use, In Dnat page we cannot identify wich ports are used, it is needed check in each object.
    We cannot usage two objects in the DNAT rule (the Gui interface allow, but does not work).

    We need a big effort, to create a simple rule, and after create it we cannot change/manage it


    IMHO this is a regretion, as other users already expressed the same feeling.

    With Public Source Port direct in Dnat rule the control and management it was very simple, like in CR devices.

     

    Regards