This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Please clarify IPS Policies?

I see these 10 IPS Policies available with very minimal description for what they do, what situation they apply to, and their relative “strengths”.  I assume strict is stronger than general.

1. DMZ TO LAN

2. DMZ TO WAN

3. LAN TO DMZ

4. LAN TO WAN

5. WAN TO DMZ

6. WAN TO LAN

7. generalpolicy

8. lantowan strict policy

9. lantowan general policy

10. dmzpolicy

Are the Policies directionally dependent , meaning LAN to WAN differs from WAN to LAN?  How?  I have seen other posts saying the source and destination Zones do not matter as the reverse traffic is also checked according to the policy.  Is this true, which would imply LAN to WAN and WAN to LAN are identical?

Do I need two firewall rules one applying WAN TO LAN and the other LAN TO WAN?

What is the difference between lantowan general policy and LAN to WAN?

What is the security level of generalpolicy relative to the others?

The Wizard created a default firewall rule using generalpolicy.  Does that mean it is “good enough” for general use?

I have one web server in LAN exposed by a DNAT rule and chose to apply WAN TO LAN in that rule; however, I don’t know if that is the best choice.  Is it actually doing anything with generalpolicy in the preceeding firewall rule?

I have seen several posts saying descriptions of these policies would be forthcoming, but I can’t find such a thing.  I hope someone can and will do it in response.



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • I have this same question. What is the difference between LAN TO WAN, General Policy, lantowan strict and landtowan general?

    I’m currently using lantowan general, but I’m not really even sure what it does... or if I should be using one of the other three rules that sounds like they could potentially fit my needs. With no information, it’s not really possible to make a decision.

Reply
  • I have this same question. What is the difference between LAN TO WAN, General Policy, lantowan strict and landtowan general?

    I’m currently using lantowan general, but I’m not really even sure what it does... or if I should be using one of the other three rules that sounds like they could potentially fit my needs. With no information, it’s not really possible to make a decision.

Children
  • Hi folks,

    the best way for you to tell is to open each IPS rule and examine what IPS features are included. I know it is messy and time consuming but will help you understand the way XG thinks.

    Ian

  • When I open the LAN TO WAN policy, it lists a bunch of categories such as "Operating System and Services", "ERP System", etc. You can't actually view anything. When I view "lantowan general", there is a "Migrate_def_filter_3"  that I can open which lists 7158 rules I can scroll through. When I open "lantowan_strict", there is a "Migrate_def_filter_2" that shows 7158 rules as well that looks identical. Bottom line, I can't even view what's in LAN TO WAN and the other two appear to be the same, and scrolling through 7158 really doesn't help me understand these policies. Someone or a group of people obviously created these at Sophos. All we need is little more detailed description on the purpose of each policy, recommended use and differences between each other.

  • Hi,

    the more I look and play with tihs stuff the more I being to understand (long way to go). The first 6 are templates which have everything in them but for different end points eg client and server. What I can't find is what determines whether you are protecting a client or a server other then maybe firewall rule type eg business rule for server and user for client?

    The other filters have been provided for you to use, fine tune by removing some of the IPS rules or build your own to remove whole IPS functions eg I just deleted ERP and control from my IPS rule. You can review each IPS group by selecting category and then ticking the box you wish to review, reduces number of IPS item significantly.

    Ian

    I am trying to help so don't shoot the messenger, yes the documentation is very poor.

  • Shred,

    I am glad to not be alone but sorry you are struggling also.  I had much better luck getting responses in the UTM group than I have had in the XG group.  Returning to the IPS Policies, I intend to somehow inspect them and document their contents so that I can compare them and learn from it.  It will take a long time because there is apparently no way to print or export.

    Dean