I see these 10 IPS Policies available with very minimal description for what they do, what situation they apply to, and their relative “strengths”. I assume strict is stronger than general.
1. DMZ TO LAN
2. DMZ TO WAN
3. LAN TO DMZ
4. LAN TO WAN
5. WAN TO DMZ
6. WAN TO LAN
7. generalpolicy
8. lantowan strict policy
9. lantowan general policy
10. dmzpolicy
Are the Policies directionally dependent , meaning LAN to WAN differs from WAN to LAN? How? I have seen other posts saying the source and destination Zones do not matter as the reverse traffic is also checked according to the policy. Is this true, which would imply LAN to WAN and WAN to LAN are identical?
Do I need two firewall rules one applying WAN TO LAN and the other LAN TO WAN?
What is the difference between lantowan general policy and LAN to WAN?
What is the security level of generalpolicy relative to the others?
The Wizard created a default firewall rule using generalpolicy. Does that mean it is “good enough” for general use?
I have one web server in LAN exposed by a DNAT rule and chose to apply WAN TO LAN in that rule; however, I don’t know if that is the best choice. Is it actually doing anything with generalpolicy in the preceeding firewall rule?
I have seen several posts saying descriptions of these policies would be forthcoming, but I can’t find such a thing. I hope someone can and will do it in response.
This thread was automatically locked due to age.