Hey AlanT,
Hope you can update us on the future of v17 and future of v18?
Since v17 is released i'm sure alot of new improvements are in the pipeline.
This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Hey AlanT,
Hope you can update us on the future of v17 and future of v18?
Since v17 is released i'm sure alot of new improvements are in the pipeline.
Hey tom greene
Make sure to keep an eye out on our Release Notes & News and Sub-groups for new updates and upcoming betas for future releases.
I'll also tag AlanT and talex in case they wanted to chime in with any further information.
Regards,
FloSupport | Sophos Community Engineer
The issue with HA is only affecting Sophos XG Management through Sophos Central.
This issue is also present in Sophos XG 17.5 GA.
The problem is, that with this issue a Sophos XG 17.5 GA or 17.5 MR-1 can't be managed through Sophos Central.
It isn't affecting anything else in HA Setup.
Also Sophos XG 17.5 MR-3 is scheduled for 10th Feburary 2019.
So you might want to wait for that. :)
Hi Ian,
My apologies regarding this delay.
Our team has recently published this KBA to provide more information regarding APX and Sophos XG Firewall compatibility.
Hope that helps! Please don't hesitate to reach out to me directly if you had any further questions or concerns.
Regards,
At the pace things goes, I will most probably get "exited". I have a year left on subscription and as usual, in 6 month I will take a decision. V18 won't be there. I am not enthusiast at moving things on another platform, considering moving into XG was the most painful in my life, but what I see here just don't work.
When they engaged into wrapping many open source products and integrate them into an interface package called XG, the idea was nothing short of excitements. "All-in-One" dream like we say.
However, the implementation that was once first and unique is being was doubled by other actors in the industry. Seriously. Much like the story featuring actors like a turtles and rabbits.
Don't get me wrong, APX is a welcome addition, but I welcomed that addition in written here more than a year ago.
XG is trailing behind just too much. The level of knowledge required to make XG work properly is such that one might wrap all those package himself. XG being just a GUI in fact.
It is only my opinion however. Everybody else is welcome to be more optimist.
Paul Jr