Hello
I am adding and moving firewall rules but from the list of firewall rules i see they are out of order. See attached screen shot.
Is this expected?
This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Hello
I am adding and moving firewall rules but from the list of firewall rules i see they are out of order. See attached screen shot.
Is this expected?
This may explain it better. I want to restrict a single device to be able to only connect to the internet on dns and vpn and block all other access. This is failing some some reason the block rule is inserting it self as rule 14 so may vpn access is pushed back to rule id 15. I cannot change the order of the rule ids even though i have place the firewall rule higher.
This may explain it better. I want to restrict a single device to be able to only connect to the internet on dns and vpn and block all other access. This is failing some some reason the block rule is inserting it self as rule 14 so may vpn access is pushed back to rule id 15. I cannot change the order of the rule ids even though i have place the firewall rule higher.
The rule ID have nothing to do with the rule order (yes i know it sounds strange).
The rules are processed from top to bottom so in tihs case, first rule ID 13 then 15 and last Rule id 14.
Wy it's failing it's hard to say without the rest of the rulebase and the IP of NAS2.
My guess is that you have a rule that gets hit by the trafiC before this ones. What does the Firewall log say?
Hi ,
As mentioned by RickardNordahl, the rules follow from top to bottom and have nothing to do with the Rule number. The Rule number is created as per the order of the creation and usually used for reference. If you are confused which rule applies to a systems traffic you may conduct a packet picture under diagnostics and check which RULE ID does it traverse through.
Regards,
Aditya Patel
Global Escalation Support Engineer | Sophos Technical Support
Knowledge Base | @SophosSupport | Sign up for SMS Alerts
If a post solves your question use the 'This helped me' link.
Hello all
thank you for the replies. i have figured it out. my udp_1198 service had the src/dst port as 1198. i have altered it to
source 1:65535 and destination port 1198
this is now working.
thanks again
Hi Requiem
Thank you for an update so you have understood the working of the Rule and how to troubleshoot them.
Regards,
Aditya Patel
Global Escalation Support Engineer | Sophos Technical Support
Knowledge Base | @SophosSupport | Sign up for SMS Alerts
If a post solves your question use the 'This helped me' link.
Yes, i new to sophos coming from an old Cisco ASA5505 so im very much new and still learning.
thank you again for your time and assistance all