Guest User!

You are not Sophos Staff.

Thread Info
  • State Verified Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 26 subscribers
  • Views 9935 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Multiple Business Application rules using Path routing and same domain

Jason Vorbeck

Hi, I am a new XG admin coming from TMG 2010. I am building my server publishing rules and I have hit a snag. I have multiple rules on the same host.domain.com using path specific routing for my Exchange servers. In TMG this is no problem as the rule engine goes down the list until it finds a matching hostname and path. The XG is forcing me to work the same way with Exchange Templates for Autodiscover, Outlook Anywhere and Exchange General all using path specific routing HOWEVER, when I try and save the second rule (First being O-Any) for Exchange General it stops me with the red notice that I already have a rule using the same "Hosted Address; Protocol Type or Listening Port". Well of course I do! Is this normal? I don't really understand the point of path specific if the hostname has to be unique but is that what is required with XG? I have to have two separate host names for Outlook Anywhere and Outlook Web?

 

Thanks in advance!



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    Jason,

    can you share what your needs are?

    Did you have a look at UTM9 WAF guide?

    https://networkguy.de/?p=998

    Thanks

  • 0 in reply to lferrara

    Hi. I am just looking to publish the Exchange server web services. My question was two fold I suppose. 1.) Is my understanding correct that the XG does not distinguish rules as being unique when they are path specific, containing the same host but different paths? 2.) Am I required to separate my hostnames to use both Exchange web service templates?

     

    That being said, the guide you were kind enough to share shows that it is possible to concatenate both templates into a single rule which would also suffice. So thank you for that!

  • +1 in reply to Jason Vorbeck

    Jason,

    of course you can with XG use the same domain and host with different path. Oooo you have remembered me when I spent years on Isa server 2004, 2006 on a big customer. ISA server and TMG are still the best reverse proxy in terms of features set and deployment (even if they did not provide any security protection like UTM9 or XG).

    Nice time!

    Let us know if you will succeed and mark the reply as answered if it is so the thread will be closed.

    Regards

Reply
  • +1 in reply to Jason Vorbeck

    Jason,

    of course you can with XG use the same domain and host with different path. Oooo you have remembered me when I spent years on Isa server 2004, 2006 on a big customer. ISA server and TMG are still the best reverse proxy in terms of features set and deployment (even if they did not provide any security protection like UTM9 or XG).

    Nice time!

    Let us know if you will succeed and mark the reply as answered if it is so the thread will be closed.

    Regards

Children
No Data