Guest User!

You are not Sophos Staff.

This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Communication between DC's with STAS for SSO... NEED HELP!

WARNING... Amature looking for guidance. :-)

Environment:

  • Standard network Windows Network
  • 2 Active Directory Domain Controllers (for redundancy: BOTH Server 2008 R2)
    • DC 1: 10.130.210.40  (FSMO Roles: PDC, RID pool master, Infrastructure master)
    • DC 2: 10.130.210.41  (FSMO Roles: Schema master, Domain naming master)
  • Sophos XG 230: 10.130.210.112
  • Windows 7 and Windows 10 workstations

 

SO, I have been struggling to get my new Sophos XG 230 off the ground (as far as SSO Clientless Authentication).  After DAYS of messing around with this... I think I am starting to aleast hone in on some of my issues.

Observed Problem: Users will get added to the "Live Connections" screen... but then within minutes drop off. (Lock or Logoff and the user will be back on, and everything starts to work again... for a few minutes).

Where I THINK the problem exists:  Communication between the 2 DC's running "Sophos Transparent Authentication Suite" (I know documentation shows one DC should have one "Suite", and the other "Agent".  But I have tried both ways, and I don't think that is my problem.

NOTICED ISSUES: Under the "Advanced" tab on the STAS Suite, some of the test FAIL:

Test Connectivity: Sophos (XG appliance): Successful

STAS Agent: From DC1 to DC1: Success

STAS Agent: From DC1 to DC2: FAILURE

STAS Collector: From DC1 to DC1 (or DC2 to DC2): Success

STAS Collector: From DC1 to DC2: Failure

ALSO:

If I try and use the "Configuration Sync" to copy information between the 2 DC's... They both show FAILURE:

-------------------------------

So I am "THINKING" my issue is communication between the two DC's (as far as STAS needs):

I know the literature states to open TCP/UDP ports: 6677, 5566, 6060

I even found this reply to a similar issue:

Question/HELP:

I am FAR from a Server/Network expert (I wear to many hats(jobs) here to get GOOD at anything).  But this is what I did to "Open Ports" for these needed connections (PLEASE correct my errors).

STEPS:

  • ON BOTH DC's (Adminitrative Tools>Windows Firewall with Advanced Security):
  • Inbound Rules: "New Rule"
    • Select "Port"
    • "Specific local ports":  TCP: 5566
    • "Allow the connection"
    • "When does the rule apply?"  I selected "Domain" and "Private"... I did not check "Public"?  (Not sure what I should have used here?)  Would like to keep things SECURE!
    • Gave it a name and "Finish".

After this I repeated it w/ - Inbound: UDP:6677

Then I configured: "Outbound Rules"

I did this on BOTH DC's... but STILL can not communicate between the two (as far as testing like above: w/ STAS "Test Connectivity".

NOTE: I can PING between the DC's w/ no problem

 

I TRULY appreciate any help on configuring this... I am starting to run short on time on getting this into production, and am SO LOST!

 

THANKS to ANYONE who can help!



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • What i would do is to start troubleshooting by trying to disable the windows firewall on the server first to rule out the windows firewall being a problem.

    Then test authentication settings on the xg, is the stas service running on the dcs?  Try running services with the domain administrator account.

    I would work on getting stas up on the primary dc first to get stuff going then go set the secondary stas if they are not running at all.

    Can you verify importing active directory groups in the xg?  That might give you another clue maybe the fqdn isn't set correctly.

    Try stas transparent mode that worked when i set it up the first time.

    Good luck!

  • HI B.R.O, 

    We would recommend you to contact support  to troubleshoot this issue closely. The configuration seems good to me but we may need to investigate the audit logs on your  AD server . Hope your DC server functions as Active -Passive instead of Active-active. 

    Let me know the Case# so I may monitor this issue for you . 

  • Aditya,

     

    Thanks for the reply.


    I actually have opened a case up over a week ago, but correspondence has been SLOW, and I has not progress very systematically (never been asked for any logs from Servers). 


    If you (or others) don't mind looking at the case and seeing what can be done to help, I would be VERY appreciative!

     

    CASE: 7043180

Reply
  • Aditya,

     

    Thanks for the reply.


    I actually have opened a case up over a week ago, but correspondence has been SLOW, and I has not progress very systematically (never been asked for any logs from Servers). 


    If you (or others) don't mind looking at the case and seeing what can be done to help, I would be VERY appreciative!

     

    CASE: 7043180

Children
No Data