Thread Info
  • State Verified Answer
  • +1 person also asked this people also asked this
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 43 replies
  • Answers 3 answers
  • Subscribers 50 subscribers
  • Views 126289 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Bad URL Categorization

LINCK

Hi Sophos

Customers of XG Firewalls are reporting a bad url clasification, for example, this sites are detected as Porn/Sexuality/Nudity in other Sophos products but the clasification in XG firewall is bad.

Support say me that "Send a URL Request" but the troubble is that these URLs are Porn.

Please check.

Regards

 

Linck Tello Flores

INNOVARE




[locked by: Sure Win at 12:59 PM (GMT -8) on 13 Feb 2018]
Parents
  • 0

    Try a general search like naked women, some sites are blocked others are not. Many complaints, but no positive action.

    I would have thought they should be using the same url check source, but apparently not?

    Ian,

    home UTM 9.x running in ESXi 6 e3-1275v2

    AP55c and AP10 (courtesy Astaro)

    Three other UTMs, SUM and SFM in hibernation

    XG 15.x MR3 in hibernation

Reply
  • 0

    Try a general search like naked women, some sites are blocked others are not. Many complaints, but no positive action.

    I would have thought they should be using the same url check source, but apparently not?

    Ian,

    home UTM 9.x running in ESXi 6 e3-1275v2

    AP55c and AP10 (courtesy Astaro)

    Three other UTMs, SUM and SFM in hibernation

    XG 15.x MR3 in hibernation

Children
No Data
Cookie Information Banner