IPv6 DHCP-PD Support

Wish I would have known this about 4 hours ago. Just finished setting up XG on a utm 220 to replace a virtual instance. This really sucks.

Thanks Sophos for your lack of support!!

Now to see if I can remove it from my infrastructure and start over again!

Wish I would have known this about 4 hours ago. Just finished setting up XG on a utm 220 to replace a virtual instance. This really sucks.

Thanks Sophos for your lack of support!!

Now to see if I can remove it from my infrastructure and start over again!

Not seen as a high priority by Sophos was the answer when raised during v17 beta.

Ian

It is truly inexplicable that we are now at the doorstep of 2018 and a feature that most major providers, at least in the US, use to hand out IPv6 addresses on both residential and business service, is totally AWOL in a next generation firewall.  I know there are workarounds and I'm using one, but really no excuse for it.

Hi Bill,

I am too, but it is not reliable. I have to reset the ISP connection in the XG if the link drops.

Hi,

I have been playing around with putting a UTM in front of the XG, works so far. Need to put the XG into bridge mode which is a major rework of static addressing.

Ian