Thread Info
  • State Suggested Answer
  • +1 person also asked this people also asked this
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 30 subscribers
  • Views 16949 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

DHCP option (66)

JonWestgate

Hello All,

I'm trying to see if a bug that was present in Cyberoam has been fixed.

This would be the one where option 66 (next-server on isc-dhcp and many others) its TFTP_Server_Name(66) in the world of Cyberoam / Sophos XG is totally ignored and a value of 0.0.0.0 is sent to the client.


So far I have been unable to prove this because then I do a tcpdump filedump 'proto UDP and port 67'

because https://<appliance ip>/documents/filedump.pcap returns a 404 error as does https://<appliance ip>/documents/tcpdump.pcap

So its 2 questions really.

Is the DHCP option 66 thing going to get fixed?

Has /documents been removed it was a very useful feature, if its been removed that means a real pain faffing about with port mirroring on switches and notebooks with wireshark.



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    Hi,
    I haven't been able to find any dhcp options or even any place to add options. So you might need to add a feature request?

    Ian

    Ian,

    home UTM 9.x running in ESXi 6 e3-1275v2

    AP55c and AP10 (courtesy Astaro)

    Three other UTMs, SUM and SFM in hibernation

    XG 15.x MR3 in hibernation

Reply
  • 0
    Hi,
    I haven't been able to find any dhcp options or even any place to add options. So you might need to add a feature request?

    Ian

    Ian,

    home UTM 9.x running in ESXi 6 e3-1275v2

    AP55c and AP10 (courtesy Astaro)

    Three other UTMs, SUM and SFM in hibernation

    XG 15.x MR3 in hibernation

Children
No Data
Cookie Information Banner