Guest User!

You are not Sophos Staff.

This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

DHCP reservations

I am going from a Windows Server DHCP to our Sophos Firewall.

Am I to understand that the Sophos Firewall does not do static IP reservations? Or at least does not do it in the same manner as Windows does?

Does the reserved IP have to be outside of the lease pool?



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • I too am finding out how different the platforms from SG series to XG series really are!!

    In SG, you could have a dynamically assigned IP to an endpoint and within the options you could designate to "keep" that IP, despite it still being in the pool.

    Why would anyone do this and not just statically assign something outside of the pool?

    Simple, you may have a vendor's printer or kiosk you have no admin access for, but you've set up workstations to use that particular IP on said device. It was a great solution to quickly segment the IP from the pool to never be used for another device despite downtime or power outage for a range of time; now that I've replaced the SG with an XG, I have the same printer that I don't have access for, thus I can't quickly designate the IP without the vendor interaction now. I was hoping that feature was still available,

    lol so far the only thing similar about SG/XG is that they are both made by Sophos!!! I mean, can't even 1:1 NAT on XG either :) ah growing pains

  • Just for your information: UTM would assign the ip in duplicate manner. You can read about this in the UTM Online help. UTM can potentially cause IP conflicts, if you do this. 

    Personally, i would differentiate between client and server resources. Something you want to access and something, which is used to access. In the end, most customer in larger environments use the DHCP and DNS services of there AD services or external resources. 

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • Oh no way!! Glad that never happened to me, "duplicating IP in DHCP", good to know! Even tho we're phasing out SG. 

    Alas, this was just really for like one device, maybe two at best in case it was warranted (I prefer static). Seemed useful and I was surprised when someone showed me the capability of it, nice little trick in a bind.

Reply
  • Oh no way!! Glad that never happened to me, "duplicating IP in DHCP", good to know! Even tho we're phasing out SG. 

    Alas, this was just really for like one device, maybe two at best in case it was warranted (I prefer static). Seemed useful and I was surprised when someone showed me the capability of it, nice little trick in a bind.

Children
No Data