Hi,
we have 3 HA Active/Passive Clusters with XGS136.
They all have Port10 as dedicated HA Port and are linked with 1m patch cables of good quality.
All 6 nodes show dropped packets and some also show port errors on Port10 for RX only.
Some of the Ports 1-8 are LAG members and have no problems.
.
Last weekend we had a XGS136 HA failover and support checked the logs and said, it was probably due to port failures on Port10.
We replaced the cable on one cluster and the dropped counters are still increasing slowly.
.
I'd like to know if there is a known issue about that on XGS136 or XGS in general.
Also it would be interesting if Port9 and Port10 on the XGS136 are on different NIC chips than Port1-Port8 and you eventually have driver or hardware issues with this type of NIC.
The issues have been noticed on v18.5 MR3 and remain after MR4 upgrade.
On a XG430 Cluster of same SFOS we do not see Port issues on the dedicated HA Port.
XGS Node A:
Line 25: RX packets:4916490 errors:0 dropped:331 overruns:0 frame:0
Line 26: TX packets:5247123 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
XGS Node B:
Line 38: RX packets:5244383 errors:0 dropped:255 overruns:0 frame:0
Line 39: TX packets:4910584 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
XGS Node C:
Line 90: RX packets:28642783 errors:13 dropped:21 overruns:0 frame:0
Line 91: TX packets:30965318 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
XGS Node D:
Line 102: RX packets:30965536 errors:0 dropped:52 overruns:0 frame:0
Line 103: TX packets:28642989 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
XGS Node E:
Line 113: RX packets:11093468 errors:0 dropped:253 overruns:0 frame:0
Line 114: TX packets:12009476 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
XGS Node F:
Line 126: RX packets:2763095 errors:0 dropped:403 overruns:0 frame:0
Line 127: TX packets:2379916 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
This thread was automatically locked due to age.