This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Top Replies

  • The specific change you mention was a result of a security review we carried out on the OTP functionality. It is not good practice to provide methods to recover existing secrets because this makes it much easier to create cloned tokens that could be used without the knowledge of the original user to gain access to their account. Recovering OTP on an account by deleting the existing secret and creating a new one is more secure because even if it is done by the wrong person, the original user will realize the error the next time they try and log in using their old token.

    You see the same behaviour in most websites that offer OTP options like this - the only way to recover if you lose your OTP is to re-initialize with a new secret.

    Your point about including more specifics about this in the release notes is valid. We try to keep the release notes brief so that customers can read them all quickly and identify areas that may concern them where they can dig in to documentation to find out more. Sometimes we make them too brief. We'll take your feedback into account.

    [I updated my original post because I mistakenly thought I was reading the v19 EAP1 forum. Apologies for any confusion.]

    Jump to answer
Parents
  • Hi folks,

    I have installed this version on my xg115W and it is not working well. I have tried a number of different configurations. The aim was to replace my home XG with this new box. I built a configuration based  on my existing system but with many cleaned up and refined policies and firewall rules. That was a disaster, throughput for speediest max'ed out the line, but web surfing, just did not work at all well, pages took many seconds and sometimes minutes to load and more often timed out leaving online payments in limbo.

    A restart partially fixed the issue but not completely.

    The logviewer showed many failed to associate connection errors.

    I removed over 50% of the configuration and in a lot of cases used the default XG provided policies with my firewall rules. With one user connected works well, while not as quick with page loads as my existing XG, still worked.

    I moved my IoT network across again after refining and reducing the configuration and end up with poor connection times and lots of cannot associate errors in the logviewer.

    So, the conclusion I have come to is that this version of XG software is not suitable for my XG115w with a full business licence.

    My IoT network has 7 wifi devices and 5 fixed devices, which most are not always active or powered on.

    Ian

    XG115W - v19.5.1 mr-1 - Home

    If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.

  • Same here with a XG115w, in reality I just wished the WebUI has a "little" bit faster. (I can make a coffee with the time It takes to create and apply a new WAF Rule.)


    If a post solves your question use the 'Verify Answer' button.

    XG 115w Rev.3 8GB RAM v19.5 MR1 @ Home.

  • What are we discussing here. Connection delay or Webadmin responsibility? 

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • We are talking about device performance both to users and the gui performance.

    ian

    XG115W - v19.5.1 mr-1 - Home

    If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.

Reply Children
No Data