Guest User!

You are not Sophos Staff.

Thread Info
  • State Verified Answer
  • +1 person also asked this people also asked this
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 181 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 76 subscribers
  • Views 34660 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Sophos Firewall: v18.5 MR2: Feedback and experiences

LuCar Toni

https://community.sophos.com/sophos-xg-firewall/b/blog/posts/sophos-firewall-v18-5-mr2-is-now-available

Release Notes: https://docs.sophos.com/releasenotes/output/en-us/nsg/sf_185_rn.html

"Old" V18.5 MR1 Thread: https://community.sophos.com/sophos-xg-firewall/f/discussions/128960/sophos-firewall-v18-5-mr1-feedback-and-experiences/

"Old" V18.0 MR5 Thread: https://community.sophos.com/sophos-xg-firewall/f/discussions/127053/xg-firewall-v18-mr-5-feedback-and-experiences

Please review: https://support.sophos.com/support/s/article/KB-000043489?language=en_US



Prio
[gesperrt von: LuCar Toni um 8:07 AM (GMT -7) am 26 Mar 2022]
Parents
  • 0

    The good bad and the ugly

    1/. the reports are now showing local time - good

    2/. VPN lighter is back - bad

    3/. ultra surf proxy is back - bad

    4/. CPU usage is still higher then previous version even after a restart - not so good

    5/. DHCP no improvements in the display of IPv6 addresses - ugly

    6/. seems to suffer poor communication with CM - indicates IP4 connection failures in email messages but not IPv6 failures - bad. I would expect if the IP4 link is down so would the IPv6 be down.

    7/. GUI slow after restart but then improves after about 5 minutes - good

    8/. no FQDN selectable in IPv6 destination networks - bad

    Ian

    XG115W - v19.5.1 mr-1 - Home

    If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.

  • 0 in reply to rfcat_vk

    On the subject of CPUs, how many are running on Atom based machines, I'm looking at pressing an e3845 atom back into service, but I'm also looking at some of the C3000 atom options.

    I previously ran it on a Dell PowerEdge R220 with an  Intel Xeon E3-1240L, but trying to reduce power consumption of kit.  I've got a Dell T320 running TrueNas, which will be pretty juicy.

Reply
  • 0 in reply to rfcat_vk

    On the subject of CPUs, how many are running on Atom based machines, I'm looking at pressing an e3845 atom back into service, but I'm also looking at some of the C3000 atom options.

    I previously ran it on a Dell PowerEdge R220 with an  Intel Xeon E3-1240L, but trying to reduce power consumption of kit.  I've got a Dell T320 running TrueNas, which will be pretty juicy.

Children
No Data
Share Feedback
×

Submitted a Tech Support Case lately from the Support Portal?