Guest User!

You are not Sophos Staff.

This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Sophos XG - Site to Site VPN to Branch Draytek Behind NAT

Hi All,

Needing some help with this, we have a Site to Site VPN from our head office with a Sophos XG, to our Branch Office that has a Draytek behind a NAT.

This currently works with a Draytek to Draytek, with the branch behind the NAT, but am trying to roll out the Sophos XG at our head office.


From testing, I have received the below logs, which looks like there is a mismatch in Phase 1 & 2 protocols, however, I can't see any mismatch in the config:


XG230_WP02_SFOS 18.0.5 MR-5-Build586# tail -f /log/strongswan.log | grep -i "Site_1"
2021-08-20 14:01:23 18[CFG] <Site_1-1|8> received proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_MD5_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
2021-08-20 14:01:23 18[CFG] <Site_1-1|8> configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_MD5_96/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_256/AES_CBC_192/AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA2_512_256/HMAC_SHA2_384_192/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/AES_XCBC_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
2021-08-20 14:01:23 18[IKE] <Site_1-1|8> no matching proposal found, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
2021-08-20 14:01:23 18[IKE] <Site_1-1|8> ### destroy: 0x7ff6b400af50
2021-08-20 14:01:23 18[ENC] <Site_1-1|8> generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 4038046832 [ HASH N(NO_PROP) ]
2021-08-20 14:01:23 18[NET] <Site_1-1|8> sending packet: from 61.67.12.156[4500] to 110.141.224.237[4500] (76 bytes)
2021-08-20 14:01:26 29[NET] <Site_1-1|8> received packet: from 110.141.224.237[4500] to 61.67.12.156[4500] (156 bytes)
2021-08-20 14:01:26 29[IKE] <Site_1-1|8> received retransmit of request with ID 1692804599, but no response to retransmit
2021-08-20 14:01:32 23[NET] <Site_1-1|8> received packet: from 110.141.224.237[4500] to 61.67.12.156[4500] (156 bytes)
2021-08-20 14:01:32 23[IKE] <Site_1-1|8> received retransmit of request with ID 1692804599, but no response to retransmit
2021-08-20 14:01:35 20[NET] <Site_1-1|8> received packet: from 110.141.224.237[4500] to 61.67.12.156[4500] (76 bytes)
2021-08-20 14:01:35 20[ENC] <Site_1-1|8> parsed INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 1964139744 [ HASH D ]
2021-08-20 14:01:35 20[IKE] <Site_1-1|8> received DELETE for IKE_SA Site_1-1[8]
2021-08-20 14:01:35 20[IKE] <Site_1-1|8> deleting IKE_SA Site_1-1[8] between 61.67.12.156[192.168.0.2]...110.141.224.237[192.168.0.2]
2021-08-20 14:01:35 10[CFG] <9> selected peer config "Site_1-1"
2021-08-20 14:01:35 10[IKE] <Site_1-1|9> IKE_SA Site_1-1[9] established between 61.67.12.156[192.168.0.2]...110.141.224.237[192.168.0.2]
2021-08-20 14:01:35 10[IKE] <Site_1-1|9> scheduling rekeying in 85994s
2021-08-20 14:01:35 10[IKE] <Site_1-1|9> maximum IKE_SA lifetime 86354s
2021-08-20 14:01:35 10[ENC] <Site_1-1|9> generating ID_PROT response 0 [ ID HASH ]
2021-08-20 14:01:35 10[NET] <Site_1-1|9> sending packet: from 61.67.12.156[4500] to 110.141.224.237[4500] (76 bytes)
2021-08-20 14:01:35 19[NET] <Site_1-1|9> received packet: from 110.141.224.237[4500] to 61.67.12.156[4500] (156 bytes)
2021-08-20 14:01:35 19[ENC] <Site_1-1|9> parsed QUICK_MODE request 1962348297 [ HASH SA No ID ID ]
2021-08-20 14:01:35 19[IKE] <Site_1-1|9> ### process_request invoking quick_mode_create
2021-08-20 14:01:35 19[IKE] <Site_1-1|9> ### quick_mode_create: 0x7ff6b8003a20 config (nil)
2021-08-20 14:01:35 19[IKE] <Site_1-1|9> ### process_r: 0x7ff6b8003a20 QM_INIT
2021-08-20 14:01:35 19[CFG] <Site_1-1|9> received proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_MD5_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
2021-08-20 14:01:35 19[CFG] <Site_1-1|9> configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_MD5_96/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_256/AES_CBC_192/AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA2_512_256/HMAC_SHA2_384_192/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/AES_XCBC_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
2021-08-20 14:01:35 19[IKE] <Site_1-1|9> no matching proposal found, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
2021-08-20 14:01:35 19[IKE] <Site_1-1|9> ### destroy: 0x7ff6b8003a20

Sophos XG - Head Office


Draytek Branch Office -

Any guidance would be much appreciated!

Thanks

Steele



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • FormerMember
    +1 FormerMember

    Hi , Thanks for reaching out to Sophos Community.

    'No Proposal Chosen' --> Mismatch in the policy configuration.

    2021-08-20 14:01:23 18[IKE] <Site_1-1|8> no matching proposal found, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN

    Looking at the policy on both ends, You've PFS Enabled on the Firewall ("Same as Phase 1") and disabled on the Draytek device. Either try disabling it on the Firewall or set the similar one on the Draytek end.

Reply
  • FormerMember
    +1 FormerMember

    Hi , Thanks for reaching out to Sophos Community.

    'No Proposal Chosen' --> Mismatch in the policy configuration.

    2021-08-20 14:01:23 18[IKE] <Site_1-1|8> no matching proposal found, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN

    Looking at the policy on both ends, You've PFS Enabled on the Firewall ("Same as Phase 1") and disabled on the Draytek device. Either try disabling it on the Firewall or set the similar one on the Draytek end.

Children