This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Static Routes Vs Summarization

Hi,

I have configured VLANs so for that I have configured static routes. Now as I am gaining knowledge I thought to configure Route Aggregation / Super netting instead of Static Routes. Is it possible to configure and if yes how ?

Can anyone advise and help ?

Manish



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents Reply
  • You do not need static routing on the XG because all your ip ranges are presented to the XG as one network on one port, not split. Your switch will do all the routing and send the unknown traffic to the XG as the internet gateway.
    ian

    XG115W - v19.5.1 mr-1 - Home

    If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.

Children
  • He needs static routes because the hpe switch doesn't know any routes back. Simply place a summary route in static routes (as already described).

  • A static route pointing at what? He only has one interface to the HPe switch where all the IP addresses are sent over. There is nowhere to route the traffic back. If he terminated the VLANs on the XG, then he would need static routes, but the VLANs all termination the HPe switch present an aggregated address range the XG.

    Ian

    XG115W - v19.5.1 mr-1 - Home

    If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.

  • At least he need a transfer vlan to route all the traffic.. in this vlan/network the sophos and the hpe core needs a ip address. And with this the traffic will be routed forward and backwards.