This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

XG Firewall v18 MR-4: Feedback and experiences

New Thread to cover changes / feedback / experiences. 

"Old" MR3 Thread: https://community.sophos.com/xg-firewall/f/discussions/123403/xg-firewall-v18-mr-3-feedback-and-experiences

Release Notes: https://community.sophos.com/xg-firewall/b/blog/posts/xg-firewall-v18-mr4-is-now-available



This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Top Replies

  • For XG Appliances, running in Active-Passive, we can accelerate more performance with the new fastpath technology. You should see more performance throughput on XGs running in Active-Passive. 

    The HA Setup process is improved, hence it will show more information, if the setup process missed something and failed. Instead of showing "Failed", it shows more information, what caused the failed setup process. Also the upgrade shows more alert in case of failure. 

    Jump to answer
Parents
  • Hi Lucar Toni and others,

    I have installed mr-4 and not had a iMAPS failure which is good. I can now investigate why the XG likes my CA when scanning iMAPS but fails the scanning of the SMTPS. The issue applies to two different ISP mail accounts. The ISPs are not related and use different hardware.

    Ian

    XG115W - v19.5.1 mr-1 - Home

    If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.

Reply
  • Hi Lucar Toni and others,

    I have installed mr-4 and not had a iMAPS failure which is good. I can now investigate why the XG likes my CA when scanning iMAPS but fails the scanning of the SMTPS. The issue applies to two different ISP mail accounts. The ISPs are not related and use different hardware.

    Ian

    XG115W - v19.5.1 mr-1 - Home

    If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.

Children
No Data