Thread Info
  • State Suggested Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 27 subscribers
  • Views 1289 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

X-Forward-For header in v18?

liam burke

Hi,

Does XG v18 support the XFF header? 

I've found messages from three or four years ago (v15+) that it could be enabled via command line, but nothing since.

Can anyone advise if it can be supported, and if so how we enable it?

With many thanks.

Liam



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    Hi

    Thanks for the reply,

    The scenario is this, my laptop recently got the ZScaler app installed, as a result all traffic is getting blocked as i have web filtering enabled internally.

    The ZScaler team supporting the rollout say that if we enable XFF it will fix all their issues.

    However i have created a specific rule, bypassing the proxy for my device specifically outbound on ports 443 and 80, but i am still not having any luck. So, in summary, it's XFF outbound which appears to be required.

    With thanks.

Reply
  • 0

    Hi

    Thanks for the reply,

    The scenario is this, my laptop recently got the ZScaler app installed, as a result all traffic is getting blocked as i have web filtering enabled internally.

    The ZScaler team supporting the rollout say that if we enable XFF it will fix all their issues.

    However i have created a specific rule, bypassing the proxy for my device specifically outbound on ports 443 and 80, but i am still not having any luck. So, in summary, it's XFF outbound which appears to be required.

    With thanks.

Children