Thread Info
  • State Verified Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 26 subscribers
  • Views 1098 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

IPSEC VPN with an interface that is not in the WAN zone

IvanildoGalvão

Gentlemen, I need to create an IPSEC VPN tunnel between the Sophos XG and a Sonicwall, until all right, it works.
But the interface that I will use is not from the WAN zone, it is from another zone called BRANCH, because the Sophos interface connected to this zone, maintains contact with the branch by a dedicated link.
When creating the tunnel, XG does not let you select this interface, nor does it appear, but only the interfaces of the WAN zone.

How do I solve this?

Thank you !



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents Reply
  • 0 in reply to FormerMember

    Hi, thanks for the reply.

    I understand, here in my city there are some scenarios where this type of configuration is required, the main reason for this is the fact that companies contract point-to-point links from providers, so customers have no control over these links, so they are left with fear that attackers may intercept packets in traffic, hence the need for an IPSEC tunnel.

    I am at this very moment deploying two XG 310 in HA for a client, the same one will then be without this VPN that until then worked on its previous firewall (SonicWall), I will inform you that at the moment the communication between the parent company and branch, it will only be via routing and firewall rules.

    Greetings !

Children
No Data