This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Email Notifications will not send (Email has been accepted by Device and queued for scanning)

After inital setup I have tried to configured the Email notifications in the firewall. The problem is that I couldn´t send a Testmail, I have tried both ways, the built-in email server and the external email server. When I will send the testmail nothing happens, in the logviewer I see the following entry: Email has been accepted by Device and queued for scanning

Any ideas what could occurs the problem?

Kr Steffen



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents Reply Children
  • Hi LUCar,

    I will try tomorrow when I have better access to the W10 machine, currently has a broken woofer sitting in front of it waiting for repairs.

    ian

  • Hi folks,

    the notification did not work until I disabled MTA. As soon as I disabled MTA the queued message was sent.

    So, a fresh installation of mr6 upgraded to mr-8 and notifications are working again.

    ian.

  • But in case of MTA, did your MTA services tries to connect via 0.0.0.0? 

  • Hi,

    after configuring the test XG in legacy mode, then converting to MTA, the test message - a failed login went out port 465 which is what I set the legacy mode with. The test XG uses the V18 EAP XG as a gateway so I can log the test XG behaviour.

    Ian

     

    The tests were all done after the test XG was upgraded to MR-9.

    I suspect that MTA has no affect on XG administrative email messages? So, means my testing is invalid.

  • Maybe i need to explain in more detail.

    MTA is a services to send a mail properly. In Case of some customers, i saw, XG had some issues with some Notifications to send, because the MTA could not get the SNAT (MASQ) properly. You could easily see this in a tcpdump, the XG tried to send certain mails via 0.0.0.0 (So to call: 0.0.0.0:12345 to mail.server:25 ), which the destination server could not answer at all (of course).