Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 29 subscribers
  • Views 1527 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

In addition to Web Exceptions, do you need a corresponding Firewall Rule with Web malware and content scanning disabled?

MrMojoRisin76

Greetings, I've been finding that when setting up web exceptions that they do not work. I then have to go create a FQDN Host Group with FQDN hosts that match my Web Exceptions rule, then create a Firewall policy above my existing policy that bypasses Web malware and content scanning. Lastly, I have to add the FQDN Host Group to the Sandstorm (ATP) Network / Host Exception area as well.  Why would this be?  Should the web exception be enough? Am I doing something wrong? All the syntax is correct in the web exception.



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    Hi, it should not be necessary to create additional firewall rules or FQDN Host Groups for the web exception to work. Can you post a screenshot of the web exception and firewall rule?

    Below are two examples of web exception I'm using to skip HTTPS decryption.

     

Reply
  • 0

    Hi, it should not be necessary to create additional firewall rules or FQDN Host Groups for the web exception to work. Can you post a screenshot of the web exception and firewall rule?

    Below are two examples of web exception I'm using to skip HTTPS decryption.

     

Children