This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Sophos XG 17.5 and Slow Downloads with Intrusion Prevention active

Björn Ebner over 6 years ago

I do have the impression, that Downloads a slower with Sophos XG 17.5 than with previous Versions.

When I do a speedtest (my WAN Speed is 100/40) I only get about 40/30.

I tried Speedtest on Speedtest.net from a Cabled PC.

When performing the Speedtest the CPU gets to about 90 - 100 % mostly used by IPS (Snort)

I think that this wasn't like this before Sophos XG 17.5 in previous Versions.

When I disable Intrusion Prevention I do get normal speeds.

Any idea?

Update:

I tested it also with a Sophos XG 115 on 200/100 WAN with IPS activated but there I couldn't see this issue.

This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Parents

0 rfcat_vk over 6 years ago

Hi,

please post a screenshot of your IPS settings that are causing the issue. Is the failing version running on your own hardware?

Ian
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 Björn Ebner over 6 years ago in reply to rfcat_vk

yep, it's running on my own hardware from the beginning.

IPs Settings are default lan to wan IPS Settings
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 rfcat_vk over 6 years ago in reply to Björn Ebner

Hi,

in the IPS tab please post a screenshot of the display in the first sub tab.

Ian
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 Björn Ebner over 6 years ago in reply to rfcat_vk

Sorry for the delay.

Here it is:
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 rfcat_vk over 6 years ago in reply to Björn Ebner

Hi Bjoern,

I have some more things to look at.

I tried changing my ISP setting to the default LAN to WAN and the change made no different to my 100/40 download. I did create my own IPS policy by removing all the signatures for not needed systems eg line, mail server, windows servers etc.

What is the CPU on your XG?

Please review the Reports -> Network and threats tab to see if there are any specific IPS rules that are being triggered?

Other that I am running out of ideas and will need to have one of the more technical mods review your posts.

Ian
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 LuCar Toni over 6 years ago in reply to rfcat_vk

With V17.5 we changed the IPS Pattern to Talos.

https://community.sophos.com/kb/en-us/133197

Can you check, whether they got installed or not?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 Björn Ebner over 6 years ago in reply to rfcat_vk

The Board is a Intel BLKD2500CCE with integrated Intel Atom D2500.

Maybe it's a little bit outdated now. I had this hardware since I installed Sophos UTM first time at home and it served me well up to now.

In Reporting I only see several OS-WINDOWS Microsoft Windows Hyperlink Buffer Overflow (POST) attacks. In this case the source is an iPhone.
So nothing from the PC I do the Speedtest on.

Update:

Talos IPs Patterns are installed
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 rfcat_vk over 6 years ago in reply to Björn Ebner

Hi Bjoern,

the chip is a little dated and only dual core. This will limit your performance when adding rules.

When running a speediest what does the XG GUI show for load and memory use?

Ian
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 Björn Ebner over 6 years ago in reply to rfcat_vk

Hi,

when performing a speed test CPU is at about 90% (mostly snort) and RAM is round about 50%

Bjoern

Update:

I upgraded to a Sophos XG 115 Rev2 now.

Overall Performance seems to be much better.

Only when activating IPS I don't get the full 100MBit Download in Speedtest.net

Other Speedtests and Real Downloads are fine.

Anyone with similar experience?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

0 Björn Ebner over 6 years ago in reply to rfcat_vk

Hi,

when performing a speed test CPU is at about 90% (mostly snort) and RAM is round about 50%

Bjoern

Update:

I upgraded to a Sophos XG 115 Rev2 now.

Overall Performance seems to be much better.

Only when activating IPS I don't get the full 100MBit Download in Speedtest.net

Other Speedtests and Real Downloads are fine.

Anyone with similar experience?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

No Data