Thread Info
  • State Verified Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 14 replies
  • Subscribers 28 subscribers
  • Views 18888 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Trying to setup Static Route

jmizzad

I am replacing a Cisco ADSL router with a Sophos XG Firewall

The Sophos is the default gateway at 192.168.49.2 and there is an ISP managed gateway at 192.168.49.1

The managed gateway connects to a remote site on 192.168.46.0/24 subnet

For those who know the Cisco Configs: ip route 192.168.46.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.49.1

 

I setup a Static Route as follows:

Destination IP/Netmask: 192.168.46.0/24
Gateway: 192.168.49.1
Interface: LAN interface
Distance: tried 0 up to 3

Nothing seems to be working
Can anyone help?



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    Hey,

    So I would say that it should actually look like this:
    Destination IP / Netmask:

    192.168.46.0/24
    Gateway: 192.168.46.1
    Interface: LAN interface
    Distance: tried 0 up to 3

    Whereby I usually have the gateways in the same IP range and then the network behind it differently. But as a rule you enter your destination network and the gateway of the network for static routes. So over which gateway you reach this net. With the interfaces, you have usually already selected your gateway.

    Please correct if I tell nonsense

     

    greets

  • 0 in reply to Pascal G

     

    That doesn't work, gateway must be the same as the interface

  • 0 in reply to jmizzad

    Yes, that's right, too.

    Actually it should look like this:

    192.168.46.0/24 Network Remote e1
    192.168.47.1 Gateway Remote 1
    192.168.47.254 Gateway Remote 2
    192.168.48.0/24 Network Remote 2

     

     

    edit:

    only the gateways must be in the same network. The network itself does not have to be the same as the gateway. maybe you could also realize it with an "alias" interface.

Reply
  • 0 in reply to jmizzad

    Yes, that's right, too.

    Actually it should look like this:

    192.168.46.0/24 Network Remote e1
    192.168.47.1 Gateway Remote 1
    192.168.47.254 Gateway Remote 2
    192.168.48.0/24 Network Remote 2

     

     

    edit:

    only the gateways must be in the same network. The network itself does not have to be the same as the gateway. maybe you could also realize it with an "alias" interface.

Children
No Data