This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Is 17.1.2 MR-2 ready for prime time?

Has anyone done this upgrade yet?

Cheers - Bob



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • Hi all,

    the new version seems to forget the cached FQDN Hosts on a regular basis.

    Is anyone else experiencing this issue?

    Thanks and best regards

    Dom Nik

  • Hey  

    Would it be possible to share more information regarding this issue? I'd like to investigate this further with you.

    Regards,

  •  I am seeing the issue with DNS cache as well. I haven't opened a case because I just don't have the time right now, but there is definitely something not right. I have firewall rules that only allow certain WAN destinations based on FQDN. Throughout the day users are saying they can't get to a page. When I look into it, the firewall dropped the cache for the sites and has to re-create it.

  • Hi Flo,

    thanks for your reply. As I'm a Home User, I can provide you more information/log files etc.

    Please let me know, how I can help.

     

    My use case are iOS/macOS Apps which do Certificate Pinning for https connections. I created FW rules with FQDN hosts to allow the access without https scanning for them.

    For example, a very common banking app in Germany is "Outbank" (available on iOS and macOS) which tries to phone home to "*.stoegerit.com" and tries to contact all configured banking services with https as well afterwards. The current behavior is as follows:

    - Do a FW reboot, FQDN cache is empty

    - Open the app - https requests are triggered but will fail

    - FW creates the needed FQDN cache entries during first call of the app

    - App works 1-2 times afterwards, while the FW chooses the right FW rules with the FQDNs

    - After some time the App fails again, while the FW has forgotten the FQDNs for these domains

    Thanks and best regards

    Dom Nik

  • Any updates on this issue?

Reply Children