Do you recommend XG or UTM?

Hi,

I am not going to vote because voting is a very simplistic approach to a very complex security issue. My UTM picks up more than my XG so, they are in tandem.

Each has its strengths and weaknesses so the choice is really what you are trying to achieve? Your simple vote doesn't really address complex or simple security. Big business, small business or home security.

What features do you want and does either or both have them?

Ian

Hi,

thanks for your answer!

Yes the features are available in both, XG and UTM, I'm just looking after the protection rate of the product.

So I thought it would be a good idea to start a discussion in this forum to get some new aspects and ideas.

So regarding these reviews, is it correct that XG is the much stronger product?

Regards

Hi Sabine,

I reviewed those two links you posted before I added my original answer and I was unable to find any useful information in either link that referred to your thread.

Well stronger product  in which way? I refer you to this thread about the XG

https://community.sophos.com/products/xg-firewall/f/firewall-and-policies/101990/a-summary-of-what-i-see-is-wrong-with-v17-0-x---hope-it-helps-explains-some-of-the-gripes-in-the-forums

If you want a better view I would recommend talking to a reseller/partner, one who posts in these forums eg in the UTM forum BAlfson, in the XG forum I am not sure.

Ian

Hey Sabine Weber 

This inquiry would best be directed to a Sophos Partner/Reseller to assist in helping you make an informed decision for your network.

Best,

Depends on what you are comparing. An XG with Central AV client integration will be much more securing the network than a SG/UTM. Without heartbeat, synchronized security, or any other upcoming feature like stonewalling you will have a device that relies on signatures to detect malware (Sandstorm not counted) as the SG/UTM. There is a reason, why XG is named NextGen Firewall, but that requires a Sophos Central Account and a SC AV client.

The XG has a completely different concept of security than a SG/UTM. Which one fits better to your environment has to be evaluated. Actually both solutions still have their advantages and disadvantages. If they don‘t mess it up with further development the XG can become a very good security solution in my opinion.

Depends on what you are comparing. An XG with Central AV client integration will be much more securing the network than a SG/UTM. Without heartbeat, synchronized security, or any other upcoming feature like stonewalling you will have a device that relies on signatures to detect malware (Sandstorm not counted) as the SG/UTM. There is a reason, why XG is named NextGen Firewall, but that requires a Sophos Central Account and a SC AV client.

The XG has a completely different concept of security than a SG/UTM. Which one fits better to your environment has to be evaluated. Actually both solutions still have their advantages and disadvantages. If they don‘t mess it up with further development the XG can become a very good security solution in my opinion.

Can one use Sophos Central and SC AV Client for home use?  How will Sophos Central help a home users if the home users can't even get access to Sandstorm system?

Sure I understand that the solution is meant for a large enterprise but honestly with the current infrastructure of home users and the devices they connect (i.e. IoT Cameras, Alexas, smart friges, lights, thermostats) there will be a point very very soon where a user will require to use an UTM like device to keep their home secure (I sure am).  

Thanks!