This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

NATing and Firewall Rules

I recently switched from UTM to XG and I'm having trouble figuring this out. I understand how to create the DNAT rule. On UTM I had created the the 1:1 NAT and then used regular firewall rules to control who could hit what ports. After adding a DNAT Business Application rule on XG, everything seems to work NAT wise, however, it seems like everything ends up wide open even though I haven't created any Allow rules for it. Is there a way to do a full 1:1 NAT and still control who can get to individual ports or do I have to create individual Business Application/NAT rules for each port/group of ports that I want open? Thanks for any help.



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • Hi,

    you post is not very clear as to incoming or outgoing?

    If incoming why do you want a full nat, why not source services in your firewall rule and MASQ in you NAT part of the rule.

    You can use network rules to control who goes out to what sites?

    Ian

  • I was referring to incoming, sorry. As for why, I guess it's just habit from working on client firewalls on UTM9/ASA at work and basing it off how I had it originally configured on the UTM. I also didn't realize the MASQ rule would work on incoming as well as outgoing. I had already set an any any MASQ rule for outgoing traffic.

  • Hi,

    not sure about MASQ incoming? Not sure why you would need a full NAT for incoming traffic on a UTM, you could have provided better security/management with individual NATs for each access type.

    Ian

Reply Children