This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

How to bypass scanner for something it thinks is a "virus"

In this case, its the daz loader. Sophos thinks its a virus. I know its not. I added it to the policy as excluded, however on my machine, some other files give the option to "authorize" a file as OK.

All i get for this file is "move" or "delete", neither of which I want to do.

Putting it as an exclusion is probably good for future stuff, but it will be sitting in my quarantine till i do something with it which i dont like. How to whitelist something that sophos is convinced is a virus? specifically http://www.sophos.com/en-us/threat-center/threat-analyses/viruses-and-spyware/W32~AutoRun-BSY.aspx

I know its not, and while it may be of questionable leaglity, that is really none of sophos's business.

:45575


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • Thank you for the information.

    I am aware that most virus scanners detect it as melicious.

    You have correctly identified the purpose of the program, I am not denying it. I use it for personal reasons on non corporate assets (mostly fixing peoples home computers), just so happens to be stored on our corporate network.

    Hopefully excluding it will work out to prevent error messages from reoccuring.

    It is disingenuous to call it a virus however. More likely it is a potentially unwanted application, but I understand you may have other legal reasons for filing it as such (cue conspiracy theories, M$ forcing your hand, etc).

    :45617
Reply
  • Thank you for the information.

    I am aware that most virus scanners detect it as melicious.

    You have correctly identified the purpose of the program, I am not denying it. I use it for personal reasons on non corporate assets (mostly fixing peoples home computers), just so happens to be stored on our corporate network.

    Hopefully excluding it will work out to prevent error messages from reoccuring.

    It is disingenuous to call it a virus however. More likely it is a potentially unwanted application, but I understand you may have other legal reasons for filing it as such (cue conspiracy theories, M$ forcing your hand, etc).

    :45617
Children
No Data