This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

CLBackup.exe false positive Suspicious Behavior detection

Hi All,

We use Commvault as our enterprise backup and I keep getting Suspicious behaviour detections on “c:\program files\commvault\Simpana\CLBackup.exe” “HIPS/FileWriteMod-003”

I acknowledge the detection and Authorize the application in the appropriate Anti-Virus and HIPS Policy – Suspicious Behaviour.

But with every new version increment of CLBackup.exe I have a new detection.

So far I have 6 versions of the authorized application of “CLBackup.exe”. I guess it’’’’s really not that many when you look at it but….

Is there any way to authorize the application so that a new version doesn’’’’t mean a new addition?

I understand that there may be security concerns with doing this but it’’’’s starting to get annoying.

Does anyone else use Commvault and if you do, how do you manage this?

Regards,

John

:45805


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • Hi Christian,

    Sorry for the slow response, Sophos was slow to deal with (Got the run around at the start), then Christmas happened, then I got sh!77y with their response and dropped it for a week or so. Anyway here is what they said

    ........................

    "Unfortunately, we cannot classify for all
    versions as they may vary. However, you can authorize them when they are
    detected after performing a full system scan and also including them in the
    authorized list within the HIPS policy."

    ........................

    So not really a very satisfying answer other than "No, and do what you're doing".

    I've just responded asking for an explanation into why they can't do it.

    I'm hoping that they can either include some kind of blanket authorization or assist me in doing as you suggest and getting CLBackup.exe changed by CommVault so that it stops triggering HIPS.

    Just for interest, I'd like to know who else uses CommVault and Sophos in their environments, I feel like the only one

    End of rant

    Regards

    John

    :46431
Reply
  • Hi Christian,

    Sorry for the slow response, Sophos was slow to deal with (Got the run around at the start), then Christmas happened, then I got sh!77y with their response and dropped it for a week or so. Anyway here is what they said

    ........................

    "Unfortunately, we cannot classify for all
    versions as they may vary. However, you can authorize them when they are
    detected after performing a full system scan and also including them in the
    authorized list within the HIPS policy."

    ........................

    So not really a very satisfying answer other than "No, and do what you're doing".

    I've just responded asking for an explanation into why they can't do it.

    I'm hoping that they can either include some kind of blanket authorization or assist me in doing as you suggest and getting CLBackup.exe changed by CommVault so that it stops triggering HIPS.

    Just for interest, I'd like to know who else uses CommVault and Sophos in their environments, I feel like the only one

    End of rant

    Regards

    John

    :46431
Children
No Data