This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

SEC 5.1 - Roles & Sub Estates - Groups of Groups

Hello,

We have a new requirement to grant limited permissions within SEC to some users. I have therefore been reading about roles and subestates and have been trying things, but I have come across an odd limitation.

For example, I create a sub-estate called "Treetops" and I grant access to the sub estate to AD group "SEC_Treetops". I then create a child group called "Tech_Treetops" and put the user in this group, so in order

Sub-estate permission in SEC

      Sec_Treetops

            Tech_Treetops

                  User

If I run "user and group view", "SEC_Treetops" has access as expected, but "Tech_Treetops" and the user do not.

This feels like windows 2000 architecture (can't do groups as members of groups) which is somewhat archaic.... Can anyone confirm whether this is true or not?

Best practice guidelines for AD design especially in a multi-forest environment like ours specify using multiple hierarchical group levels before applying a permission (see AGUDLP)...

Thanks!

Rob

:28891


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents Reply Children
No Data