This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Sophos On-Access Scanner gets "disabled" by Juniper Networks Host-Checker

I have a VPN connection to a customer of mine. They use the Juniper Networks VPN software. I use Sophos Endpoint v10. When I connect to their network, the Juniper software launches the "Host Checker" app. It successfully detects v10 of Sophos AV as a valid product, so it is clearly updated. However it then deletes the savonaccesscontrol.sys and savonaccessfilter.sys driver files located in C:\Windows\System32\Drivers. This means that the next time I boot my PC the on-access scanner doesn't load, leaving me under-protected, and the next time I try to connect to the Juniper VPN it won't validate me because my Sophos AV product doesn't have on-access scanning enabled. The only fix I have found, is to restore the two files, and then make them read-only so that the Host-Checker cannot delete them.

I have contacted my customer and requested that they reach out to Juniper to find out why this is happening. HOWEVER, I would like to know how it is that the Juniper client was ABLE to delete these files, since I have Tamper Protection turned on! Shouldn't these files be protected?!? This strikes me as a MAJOR flaw in your software, if a malicious app can just disable my on-access AV software!

Thoughts?

:28371


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • I was working with our vendor, and Juniper wanted all sorts of debugging info, so I provided it, and then they came back and wanted more, some of it duplicated. By that point we said heck with it and just made the files read only and told them figure it out, we don't have time to help you debug your **bleep** any more. So I have no clue what if anything they have done to remedy the issue since then, or if they said "screw them" and moved on.

    :33481
Reply
  • I was working with our vendor, and Juniper wanted all sorts of debugging info, so I provided it, and then they came back and wanted more, some of it duplicated. By that point we said heck with it and just made the files read only and told them figure it out, we don't have time to help you debug your **bleep** any more. So I have no clue what if anything they have done to remedy the issue since then, or if they said "screw them" and moved on.

    :33481
Children
No Data