Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Subscribers 1 subscriber
  • Views 2669 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

On-Access-Scan exclusions for Windows

Camelot

Hi,

i tried to add some exclusions to an Antivirus policy for our domain controllers.

But when i try to enter a wildcard filename like XYZ*.log i got an error message.

The wildcard ? is working, but not the * .

In the pictures you can see the entered wildcard.

Am i doing it wrong??

On-Access-Scan-Einstellungen_2013-11-19_10-01-23.png

:45151


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    Hello Camelot,

    Am I doing it wrong?

    yes, the * can only be used instead of the name or extension (thus *.* is not valid as well). You can use a sufficient number of ?s though, ?s at the end matching one or no characters. XYZ?????????????????.log is valid will match all logs with a name starting XYZ followed by 0 to 17 characters. Please see the help for some more examples.

    Christian

    :45157
Reply
  • 0

    Hello Camelot,

    Am I doing it wrong?

    yes, the * can only be used instead of the name or extension (thus *.* is not valid as well). You can use a sufficient number of ?s though, ?s at the end matching one or no characters. XYZ?????????????????.log is valid will match all logs with a name starting XYZ followed by 0 to 17 characters. Please see the help for some more examples.

    Christian

    :45157
Children
No Data