Hello everyone, in the last test the sophos intercept-x did not do as well as the competitors. Would this be worrying for us? Blocked User dependent Compromised PROTECTION RATE [Blocked % + (User dependent %)/2]* False Alarms Bitdefender 732 – 1 99.9% 2 G Data 732 – 1 99.9% 5 Kaspersky 731 – 2 99.7% 1 ESET 730 – 3 99.6% 0 VIPRE 730 – 3 99.6% 2 Microsoft 730 – 3 99.6% 3 WatchGuard 730 – 3 99.6% 23 Avast 729 1 3 99.5% 1 K7 729 – 4 99.5% 11 VMware 727 – 6 99.2% 6 CrowdStrike 727 – 6 99.2% 22 Cisco 725 – 8 98.9% 1 Sophos 723 2 8 98.8% 7 Elastic 724 – 9 98.8% 7 Acronis 721 – 12 98.4% 1 Trellix 721 – 12 98.4% 5 Malwarebytes 720 – 13 98.2% 16 Cybereason 679 – 54 92.6% 4 font: www.av-comparatives.org/.../

This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

last test AV Comparatives - sophos bad position

Hello everyone, in the last test the sophos intercept-x did not do as well as the competitors. Would this be worrying for us?

Blocked	User dependent	Compromised	PROTECTION RATE [Blocked % + (User dependent %)/2]*	False Alarms
Bitdefender	732	–	1	99.9%	2
G Data	732	–	1	99.9%	5
Kaspersky	731	–	2	99.7%	1
ESET	730	–	3	99.6%	0
VIPRE	730	–	3	99.6%	2
Microsoft	730	–	3	99.6%	3
WatchGuard	730	–	3	99.6%	23
Avast	729	1	3	99.5%	1
K7	729	–	4	99.5%	11
VMware	727	–	6	99.2%	6
CrowdStrike	727	–	6	99.2%	22
Cisco	725	–	8	98.9%	1
Sophos	723	2	8	98.8%	7
Elastic	724	–	9	98.8%	7
Acronis	721	–	12	98.4%	1
Trellix	721	–	12	98.4%	5
Malwarebytes	720	–	13	98.2%	16
Cybereason	679	–	54	92.6%	4

This thread was automatically locked due to age.