Chrisnichols wrote:I don't think that YOU are breaking the law by downloading a piece of software that has been misrepresented.
Chris, thanks for taking the trouble to respond in detail... reading your points carefully, I actually don't disagree with any of the points you make.
But you've neatly brought the subject back to the point at which I started... this product is something that will lead less-technical Mac users to believe that such a thing as a *nix or OS/X virus actually exists (as opposed to malware), and Sophos - knowing the truth - markets it as such. My original point is still sound: will Sophos be able to provide proof of the existence of a *nix or OS/X virus to the Advertising Standards Authority if the latter investigates a misrepresentation complaint? That's the way the ASA approaches this sort of thing.
I believe that the answer is most definitely: "No". And that will mean that this product thereby contravenes UK consumer protection legislation - QED.
Chrisnichols wrote:I don't think that YOU are breaking the law by downloading a piece of software that has been misrepresented.
Chris, thanks for taking the trouble to respond in detail... reading your points carefully, I actually don't disagree with any of the points you make.
But you've neatly brought the subject back to the point at which I started... this product is something that will lead less-technical Mac users to believe that such a thing as a *nix or OS/X virus actually exists (as opposed to malware), and Sophos - knowing the truth - markets it as such. My original point is still sound: will Sophos be able to provide proof of the existence of a *nix or OS/X virus to the Advertising Standards Authority if the latter investigates a misrepresentation complaint? That's the way the ASA approaches this sort of thing.
I believe that the answer is most definitely: "No". And that will mean that this product thereby contravenes UK consumer protection legislation - QED.