In Web Protection, Transparent mean that you don't need to configure end-users browsers to use the UTM as proxy. UTM will catch all the http/s traffic This is the same for Email Protection. All the traffic in SMTP (port 25) will be handled by UTM
Appreciate the answer however what i'm looking is the different between bridge/inline and route mode also what are features that available when deploy both method. Thanks[:D]
No QoS on bridged interfaces. I had difficulties with routing in V9 for one customer, but never discovered if the problem was outside of the UTM - we solved the problem in a different way.
both methods can be for different profiles and enviroments, however exceptions for different users or host can be aplied. For uplink is the same, the rules stands Bob can answer better in this, i teste only one utm with uplink and qos but was a very simple config
If the UTM has only two NICs and they are bridged to eachother, I can't see any need for Multipathing. If the UTM is bridged in a network with public IPs, Additional Addresses would be needed on the bridge before WAF could manage webserver traffic.
Maybe you could tell us what problem you are trying to solve...
My customer have 2 gateway which is 1 connect to adsl router and another is private network router which connect to branch.
I would like to suggest to them using inline mode but not sure does inline mode will have all the route mode option since their are short of manpower and didn't have complex infra however
